“Sabotage did not involve loss of life, and it offered the best hope for future race relations. Bitterness would be kept to a minimum and, if the policy bore fruit, democratic government could become a reality.”
Image credits: John Mathew Smith 2001,”From Wash D.C. Longworth building October 4, 1994. Mandela’s first trip to the United States.”,CC BY-SA 2.0,Nelson Mandela 1994 – Nelson Mandela – Wikipedia
- July 18, 1918 – December 5, 2013
- Born in South Africa
- Politician, lawyer
- The first black president of South Africa, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for abolishing apartheid and building a democratic South Africa where multiple ethnic groups coexist.
table of contents
Quote
“Sabotage did not involve loss of life, and it offered the best hope for future race relations. Bitterness would be kept to a minimum and, if the policy bore fruit, democratic government could become a reality.”
Explanation
This quote from Nelson Mandela reflects his justification for the armed struggle against the apartheid regime in South Africa, particularly through acts of sabotage. Mandela is explaining that sabotage—which targeted government infrastructure, military installations, and economic facilities—was a strategic method of resistance that would avoid the loss of life while still inflicting damage on the apartheid system. For Mandela, sabotage was a way to strike at the heart of apartheid’s infrastructure without directly targeting civilians, making it a less violent option compared to armed insurgency or outright rebellion. The goal was to weaken the apartheid government without fueling indiscriminate violence, thus reducing the potential for bitterness and lasting hatred between the races.
Historically, this quote comes from the period in the early 1960s when Mandela, along with other leaders of the African National Congress (ANC), decided to adopt a policy of armed resistance following the failure of peaceful protests to challenge apartheid effectively. The ANC, after years of nonviolent resistance, launched Umkhonto we Sizwe (MK), a military wing that focused primarily on acts of sabotage as a form of protest. Mandela believed that violence—while regrettable—was a necessary response to the deeply entrenched violence and repression of the apartheid system. He also hoped that, by limiting direct loss of life, the policy could ultimately lead to more constructive dialogue and a better post-apartheid future, free from the kind of deep racial bitterness that could hinder reconciliation.
In modern terms, this quote speaks to the ethics of resistance and the complexities of fighting for justice in a deeply oppressive system. It raises important questions about how best to balance moral principles with the necessity of resistance in the face of injustice. Mandela’s choice to focus on sabotage—as opposed to more violent forms of uprising—was grounded in a long-term vision of a democratic and inclusive society in South Africa. This approach also highlights the tension between the desire for justice and the practical realities of achieving political change. In today’s world, this message resonates in discussions about the ethics of civil disobedience, nonviolent resistance, and the potential trade-offs between immediate harm and long-term political progress.
