“It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both.”
- May 3, 1469 – June 21, 1527
- Born in the Republic of Florence (Italy)
- Political thinker and diplomat
- Wrote The Prince, built the foundations of modern political science, and advocated realist political thought
table of contents
Quote
“It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both.”
Explanation
In this famous statement from Niccolò Machiavelli, he articulates a central tenet of his political philosophy, which emphasizes the importance of power and control for rulers. According to Machiavelli, if a leader is forced to choose between being feared or loved by their subjects, it is safer and more effective to be feared. Fear, he argues, is a more reliable means of maintaining obedience and order than love, because fear is based on self-preservation, whereas love depends on the goodwill and voluntary affection of the people. When a ruler is loved, they may be vulnerable to changes in public opinion, betrayal, or discontent. However, fear is a constant and often more enduring motivator because it compels compliance through the fear of punishment or retribution.
Machiavelli’s assertion reflects his pragmatic view of leadership and his belief that rulers must be willing to take whatever actions necessary to maintain stability and control, even if those actions are harsh or unpopular. In his work The Prince, he explores the various ways a ruler can maintain power, and one of those ways is by using fear to deter rebellion and ensure loyalty. The ruler who is feared will be obeyed, not necessarily because of love, but because their subjects are afraid to act against them. As Machiavelli explains, fear can be maintained without cruelty—by being just enough to deter insubordination—but love, once lost, is difficult to regain.
In modern contexts, this quote still holds relevance in discussions of leadership and authority. For example, in business management, leaders who are respected (even feared) for their decisiveness and firmness often experience more consistent compliance and discipline than those who are overly accommodating or reliant on popularity. Similarly, in political leadership, a strong and sometimes authoritarian leader may maintain a firm grip on power through fear, even if they lack the affection of the populace. However, the downside to this approach is that while fear may bring short-term obedience, it can also lead to resentment, revolt, or unrest in the long term if the ruler’s actions are excessively cruel or perceived as unjust. As Machiavelli notes, fear is a tool of control, but it must be wielded carefully to avoid alienating the people entirely.
