“Politics have no relation to morals.”
- May 3, 1469 – June 21, 1527
- Born in the Republic of Florence (Italy)
- Political thinker and diplomat
- Wrote The Prince, built the foundations of modern political science, and advocated realist political thought
table of contents
Quote
“Politics have no relation to morals.”
Explanation
In this bold statement, Niccolò Machiavelli emphasizes a core principle of his realist political philosophy: that political actions should be judged by their effectiveness in achieving and maintaining power, rather than by moral considerations. Machiavelli asserts that in the realm of politics, the traditional ideals of virtue and ethics are secondary to the pragmatic realities of governing and achieving political goals. For Machiavelli, morality is often an idealistic construct that does not take into account the complexities and necessities of political life. A ruler must be willing to make difficult, sometimes immoral decisions in order to maintain order, stability, and security—which, in turn, are seen as the ultimate goals of leadership.
This viewpoint comes across most clearly in his influential work, The Prince, where Machiavelli argues that the ends justify the means. A ruler, according to Machiavelli, may need to resort to deception, manipulation, coercion, or even violence in order to protect or strengthen the state. While traditional moral philosophy might condemn such actions, Machiavelli contends that a ruler who follows moral guidelines too strictly could end up being weak or ineffective, leaving the state vulnerable to internal dissent or external threats. Therefore, in Machiavellian politics, the success of the ruler and the state is prioritized over ethical or moral considerations.
This idea has been both influential and controversial throughout history. In the modern era, the relationship between politics and morality continues to be a source of debate. Many politicians and political theorists argue that ethics and human rights should play a central role in policy decisions, while others, drawing on Machiavelli, believe that political decisions must sometimes be made without regard for moral ideals if they are in the service of national interest or security. For example, realist international relations theory, which is heavily influenced by Machiavellian thought, posits that states act primarily out of self-interest and that moral considerations are often secondary to security and power. In warfare, diplomacy, or business, leaders may adopt Machiavelli’s idea that results matter more than methods, and that ethical compromises may be necessary to achieve the greater good. However, the tension between ethics and effectiveness remains, with critics arguing that such an approach can lead to oppression, injustice, or corruption if unchecked. Machiavelli’s assertion challenges the notion that politics must be rooted in high moral standards, highlighting the complexity and sometimes harsh reality of governance.
