“The theologian considers sin mainly as an offence against God; the moral philosopher as contrary to reasonableness.”
- 1225 – March 7, 1274
- Born in the Kingdom of Sicily (Italy)
- Theologian, philosopher
- A representative figure of scholasticism, who systematized the relationship between the doctrines of the Catholic Church and reason through his masterpiece, the Summa Theologica
table of contents
Quote
“The theologian considers sin mainly as an offence against God; the moral philosopher as contrary to reasonableness.”
Explanation
Thomas Aquinas highlights the different perspectives of theologians and moral philosophers in understanding sin. According to Aquinas, a theologian views sin primarily as an offense against God—a failure to align one’s actions with divine law and to respect the relationship between the Creator and the created. For the theologian, sin is about violating God’s commandments and distancing oneself from His love and grace. In contrast, the moral philosopher sees sin as a departure from what is reasonable and rational. Sin, in this view, is an act that goes against the natural order, reason, and the pursuit of the good life. It involves acting in a way that contradicts the rational nature of human beings and ultimately leads to harm or disorder.
Aquinas sought to bridge the gap between theology and philosophy, drawing on both Christian teachings and Aristotelian ethics. In his perspective, sin could be understood both as an offense against God—reflecting the religious implications—and as something contrary to human reason—reflecting the philosophical understanding of what is virtuous and rational. He believed that since human beings are endowed with reason, to act sinfully is to act against one’s very nature and against the order that God intended for humanity. Thus, sin is not only a spiritual failing but also a failure of reason that leads one away from the pursuit of true happiness and virtue.
In modern contexts, Aquinas’s distinction is useful in understanding how different approaches can complement each other in the analysis of moral actions. The theological perspective emphasizes our relationship with the divine, recognizing sin as a disruption of that relationship. Meanwhile, the philosophical perspective highlights the role of rational thought in guiding moral behavior, viewing sin as a failure to live according to reason and virtue. Together, these perspectives provide a more comprehensive understanding of why certain actions are wrong—not only because they offend God but also because they contradict our rational, moral nature. This dual approach encourages individuals to consider both the spiritual and rational consequences of their actions, fostering a more holistic understanding of morality.
